找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives; Ruth Lister,Jo Campling Textbook 2003Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

[复制链接]
楼主: 适婚女孩
发表于 2025-3-25 06:22:20 | 显示全部楼层
Women’s Political Citizenship: Different and Equal is it to promote . by challenging the conditions, in both private and public spheres, that curtail women’s rights and opportunities as political citizens? Alternatively, following the theoretical position I have outlined, is it possible to promote women’s political citizenship by developing policies and practices that draw on both approaches?
发表于 2025-3-25 10:42:43 | 显示全部楼层
What is Citizenship?hip?’ in two ways. First, it reviews the main elements that constitute the language of citizenship and that, in different combinations, provide the ingredients of the various definitions attempted in the literature — academic and political. Second, it discusses the main ways in which the concept is
发表于 2025-3-25 12:51:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 17:16:08 | 显示全部楼层
Beyond Dichotomywithin the pluralist framework developed in the previous chapter. It argues that such a synthesis opens up the possibility of a woman-friendly, ‘gender-inclusive’ model of citizenship and that this should be our goal.
发表于 2025-3-25 23:12:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:43:55 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion: Towards a Feminist Theory and Praxis of Citizenship its exclusionary and disciplinary tendencies. Citizenship, I believe, provides an invaluable strategic theoretical concept for the analysis of women’s subordination and a potentially powerful political weapon in the struggle against it. Moreover, it throws a searching light on difference, despite i
发表于 2025-3-26 06:42:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 11:04:00 | 显示全部楼层
Reliability Metrics Formulation, 30). While attempts to elaborate such a conception demonstrate the difficulties, I will argue that this is the direction citizenship theory has to take, in relation to citizenship both as a status and a practice, if it is to match up to its inclusionary and universalist claims. Thus, rejecting the
发表于 2025-3-26 16:05:55 | 显示全部楼层
Reliability Metrics Formulation,within the pluralist framework developed in the previous chapter. It argues that such a synthesis opens up the possibility of a woman-friendly, ‘gender-inclusive’ model of citizenship and that this should be our goal.
发表于 2025-3-26 19:26:09 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-24 13:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表