Titlebook: Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850; Andrew Crome Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Ch

Diverticulum

书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850网络公开度




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850被引频次




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850被引频次学科排名




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850年度引用




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850年度引用学科排名




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850读者反馈




书目名称Christian Zionism and English National Identity, 1600–1850读者反馈学科排名

guzzle

cipher

Favorable

火花

,“Ignorance, Infatuation, and, Perhaps, Insanity!”: Jewish Restoration and National Crisis, 1793–17990s. The first part of the chapter provides an overview of Judeo-centric ideas from 1753–1790, examining particularly John Gill and Joseph Priestley. After providing background on Brothers, the chapter examines his followers’ use of restorationist ideas. In particular, Brothers’s concept that many o

声音刺耳

,“Direct the Eyes of the Jews to England”: The Jerusalem Bishopric Controversy, 1840–1841,elopments in Judeo-centric ideas from 1795, concentrating particularly on the formation of the London Society for Promoting Christianity Amongst the Jews. The chapter then traces the focus on Isaiah 18 as a prophecy of an English-led restoration of the Jews prior to their conversion. The final secti

声音刺耳

Ascribe

Conclusion,ough cautious in proposing wider applications of its historically contingent findings, it suggests the possible application of this book’s theoretical approach to other national manifestations of Christian Zionism, particularly in the United States.

滑稽

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137464729 the historiography of “elect nationhood”, which suggests a likely clash between the “elect” nation and ethnic Jews. Instead, it suggests a model of “chosen” nationhood in which the nation is defined in relation to their treatment of Israel. This portrays the Jew as a positive “other”. This is analy

Palter