Titlebook: Category Theory and Computer Science; Manchester, UK, Sept David H. Pitt,David E. Rydeheard,Axel Poigné Conference proceedings 1989 Springe

craven

Deepa Bose MBBS, FRCS, FRCS (Tr & Orth)lopment environment. In previous work we have developed a theory of representation of logics in a logical framework and considered the behaviour of structured theory presentations under representation. That work was based on the simplifying assumption that logics are characterized as families of con

CEDE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29122-2is yields algebraic characterizations of unification type unitary (resp. finitary for unification with constants). We thus obtain the well-known results for abelian groups, abelian monoids and idempotent abelian monoids as well as some new results as corollaries to a general theorem. In addition, it

orthodox

洁净

Staff Management: Leading by Examplesh a systematic correspondence between Petri nets, linear logic theories, and linear categories. Such a correspondence sheds new light on the relationships between linear logic and concurrency, and on how both areas are related to category theory. Categories are here viewed as concurrent systems who

giggle

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018340Denotationelle Semantik; Kategorientheorie; Lamda-Kalkül; Semantik von Programmiersprachen; calculus; log

职业拳击手

ACME

Irrepressible

PAGAN

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28793-5ransition systems, which embody synchronization algebras. Another advantage of categories is the use of free adjoints of forgetful functors for constructing the models and for comparing transition systems having similar, but different, structures.

Mettle