找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Care Ethics, Democratic Citizenship and the State; Petr Urban,Lizzie Ward Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[复制链接]
楼主: 神像之光环
发表于 2025-3-25 07:08:10 | 显示全部楼层
Finite Element Method for Interior Problems,ing to deliberate’, the chapter argues, is congruent with feminist aims and is respectful of difference yet firmly committed to truth—a commitment critical for our so-called post-truth era. The chapter concludes by considering the limits of Gadamer’s account and the close ties between listening, solidarity and loss.
发表于 2025-3-25 08:48:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 12:24:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 19:32:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 23:20:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:41:15 | 显示全部楼层
Donatella Occorsio,Woula Themistoclakisle interdependence. Arguing for the latter, the discussion reimagines both cosmopolitanism and care from the perspective of mutual dependencies highlighted by the migration crisis of Indian health care workers.
发表于 2025-3-26 07:09:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:37:43 | 显示全部楼层
Approximating Implicitly Defined Manifolds,rovides a bird-eye view of the existing proposals for a care-oriented public administration, with a focus on a recent discussion about the possibility of merging the values of care and bureaucracy in state and public sector institutions. Finally, the chapter suggests an empirically grounded care-oriented approach to governmental institutions.
发表于 2025-3-26 14:33:27 | 显示全部楼层
Democratic Practice and ‘Caring to Deliberate’: A Gadamerian Account of Conversation and Listeninging to deliberate’, the chapter argues, is congruent with feminist aims and is respectful of difference yet firmly committed to truth—a commitment critical for our so-called post-truth era. The chapter concludes by considering the limits of Gadamer’s account and the close ties between listening, solidarity and loss.
发表于 2025-3-26 17:28:50 | 显示全部楼层
Why the Publicly Funded Solution Is Better Equipped to Provide Democratic Care ‘For All’pending on whether we are interested in, first, particularised versus standardised solutions, in which case civil society is better able to meet ethical care demands. Or whether we are interested in equal access to care for all, in which case the state provides a better alternative than either the civil society or the market.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-26 07:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表