找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions; Bruce J. Caldwell,Stephan Boehm Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992 a

[复制链接]
查看: 50671|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 17:57:46 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions
影响因子2023Bruce J. Caldwell,Stephan Boehm
视频video
学科分类Recent Economic Thought
图书封面Titlebook: Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions;  Bruce J. Caldwell,Stephan Boehm Book 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992 a
影响因子When we first invited the group of distinguished scholars represented here to contribute to a new volume on Austrian economics, four themes were stressed: tensions, new directions, selectivity, and criticism. In this brief introduction we will explain why those themes were emphasized and thereby shed light on our intentions and aspirations for the volume. The subtitle "Tensions and New Directions" indicates clearly the intent of the volume desired. If we take the 1871 publication of Carl Menger‘s Principles of Economics (Grundsiitze der Volkswirthschaftslehre) as mark­ ing its birth, the Austrian tradition is now well over one hundred years old. The origins of the so-called "Austrian Revival" are more difficult to pinpoint precisely, but many would accept two decades as a reasonable estimate of its lifespan. In any case, since the mid-1970s several collections of articles written by Austrians have been published. The intent of these collections appeared to be to educate, persuade, and inspire various audiences. Uninformed readers needed to be told about the specifics of the Austrian position, to be shown how it differed from and improved upon its rivals. The initiated needed to be
Pindex Book 1992
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions网络公开度




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions被引频次




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions被引频次学科排名




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions年度引用




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions年度引用学科排名




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions读者反馈




书目名称Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:38:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:51:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:21:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:08:33 | 显示全部楼层
Orders and Organizations: Toward an Austrian Theory of Social Institutions,eptance today by critics of this school as well as by its adherents. This is a rather striking development. Not too many years ago, the prevailing wisdom was that the American Institutionalist school (of Thorstein Veblen, John R. Commons, and Wesley C. Mitchell) was the sole repository of thinking a
发表于 2025-3-22 12:52:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:39:05 | 显示全部楼层
Turning Austrian Economics into an Evolutionary Theory,ustrian economics and the evolutionary approach are usually considered to be two distinct and independent developments. This distinction has something to it and the present chapter will give some hints as to why. However, the two schools also have much in common. It seems worthwhile, therefore, to e
发表于 2025-3-22 22:53:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:24:49 | 显示全部楼层
Afterword: Appraising Austrian Economics: Contentions and Misdirections,ehm’s recognition that there are few “practicing Austrians” among the other contributors.. In a volume of essays criticizing and calling for new directions in a research program, it is appropriate to provide some space to proponents of the research program being criticized, if only to flag any gross
发表于 2025-3-23 06:14:03 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-14 15:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表