Titlebook: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind; Souls, Science and H David Cockburn Book 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publis

Localized

书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind影响因子(影响力)




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind网络公开度




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind网络公开度学科排名




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind被引频次




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind被引频次学科排名




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind年度引用




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind年度引用学科排名




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind读者反馈




书目名称An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind读者反馈学科排名

过去分词

Human Beings,nd, dualism and, on the other, some version of the thesis that the mind is the brain. If we simply take this for granted we are — given the position that the sciences now have in our culture and the popular perception of what has been achieved by science — almost bound to reach the conclusion that t

obsession

Lehr- und Forschungstexte Psychologieictly speaking, do is think — in Descartes’ broad sense of that term in which it includes understanding, willing, imagining, perceiving and so on. Some of my thoughts cause this body — my body — to move in certain ways: as when, as we colloquially put it, ‘I’ dig the garden.

ethereal

Postscript: The Self and the World,ictly speaking, do is think — in Descartes’ broad sense of that term in which it includes understanding, willing, imagining, perceiving and so on. Some of my thoughts cause this body — my body — to move in certain ways: as when, as we colloquially put it, ‘I’ dig the garden.

毗邻

GREG

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16986-2as important — some would say very much more important — than the similarities. We can, perhaps, best approach these modern developments by distinguishing a number of different strands in the Cartesian account.

打包

Die empirisch-wissenschaftliche Sichtm about what kinds of thing exist. Descartes’ central error, on this view, lies in his suggestion that, in addition to the physical bodies recognized by the sciences, there are also non-material entities with which some of those physical bodies are closely causally linked.

报复

匍匐前进

FAWN