找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights ; A Critique of Equali Jessika Eichler Book 2024 The Editor(s) (i

[复制链接]
楼主: burgeon
发表于 2025-3-27 00:10:43 | 显示全部楼层
Neurophysiologische Korrelate der Rechnung,it makes in bringing these fields together; thirdly, engaging with the merits of interdisciplinary work when studying equality, drawing from insights from judicial studies, theory, political science, and socio-legal inquiry; and finally, presenting systemic reflections on a possible paradigm shift i
发表于 2025-3-27 03:06:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 08:17:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 10:33:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 15:13:53 | 显示全部楼层
Equality Principles and Institutionalism: Judicial Spill-Overs and Dialoguesnifestations of equality as well as their social complexity, these being addressed by Equality Bodies. Critical voices however draw our attention to their prospective politization, stressing the importance of their independence.
发表于 2025-3-27 20:24:49 | 显示全部楼层
Equality Paradigms and Contemporary Politics of Recognitione of a culturally homogenous State: the normative (the ‘ought to’ question relating to equality paradigms or differentiated treatment) and the empirical (‘on the ground realities’ of inequalities) enter a contested field of negotiation here with often contrasting portrayals of societal (in)equality.
发表于 2025-3-27 22:21:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 03:11:45 | 显示全部楼层
Exploring Counterbalancing Paradigms: Positive Discrimination and Collectivisation of ‘inclusive equality’. The duty to fulfil in particular appears to correlate with substantive equality principles, further specifying and contextualising equality, often in consideration of minority situations. While international human rights law would certainly be considered as the most influen
发表于 2025-3-28 06:50:22 | 显示全部楼层
Collective Subject-Holdership, Processes and Scales of Collectivisational standing rights. Scales of collectivisation broadly draw lines of demarcation between pro forma rights or formal equality and substantive change or genuinely inclusive rights which shall assist us in measuring the legal value of collective rights in contemporary orders comparatively. The followin
发表于 2025-3-28 10:26:46 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-17 20:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表