Titlebook: An Anthropology of Learning; On Nested Frictions Cathrine Hasse Book 2015 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2015 activity theory.cognit

他剪短

书目名称An Anthropology of Learning影响因子(影响力)




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning网络公开度




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning网络公开度学科排名




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning被引频次




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning被引频次学科排名




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning年度引用




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning年度引用学科排名




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning读者反馈




书目名称An Anthropology of Learning读者反馈学科排名

PLIC

Culture as Contested Field,f learning. I argue that researchers engage differently with the two fields. That distinction is particularly recognisable within the analytical field of organisational culture, where participants engage in ongoing fights over culture concepts. The different conceptualisations of . create, in part,

栏杆

somnambulism

Position Matters!,physical positions of the ethnographer learning in a topologically fluid space. The chapter argues that the ethnographer, in meeting the empirical field, engages with already formed structural identities and social roles, which, once learned, are valuable resources for cultural analysis. The varied

cognizant

Social Designation of Cultural Markers,atter. The chapter introduces two of four ways ethnographers learn to share cultural markers as resources with their ethnographic subjects. Cultural learning processes entail first of all learning through social designations, where word meaning is pointed out by reactions. Secondly, cultural learnin

讥讽

胎儿

Towards Nested Engagement,ist materialism helps us understand this process as one of aligning ‘relata-within-phenomena’, but lacks a vocabulary for collective practices. This vocabulary is found in cultural–historical activity theory where three different approaches to collective practices are explored. I argue that as the c

乏味

Console

Epilogue,r learns through what I call . that consist of four processes: learning through social designation, practice-based learning, learning from culture contrast and scalar learning leading to zone of development. Ethnographers write descriptions based on this evolving engagement with the empirical field.

是比赛

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40423-2hnographer as participant observer and any other participant. In order to contribute to general anthropology of cultural diversity in humankind, expert ethnographers must be sensitive to the force of culture and learn to align frictions that arise between meaning and materials with their ethnographi