找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?; Paul Weingartner Book 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004 Combinatory Logic.Interpreta

[复制链接]
楼主: probiotic
发表于 2025-3-30 09:55:51 | 显示全部楼层
Does Metaphysics Need a Non-Classical Logic?etaphysics. From the beginning we encounter a mess of difficulties. If we focus our attention on the meaning of the term, we shall find that it is polysemic. Some of its significations are obscure, and not a few even absurd.
发表于 2025-3-30 13:36:54 | 显示全部楼层
Logic and the Philosophical Interpretation of Sciencevent or relativity and quantum theories, had occurred which clearly upset much of what has become known as classical physics. But these new theories seemed to carry much more in the way of implications. For not only the classical scientific theories, but also the classical philosophies which attempt
发表于 2025-3-30 17:00:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 22:01:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 01:13:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 05:22:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 11:01:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 16:55:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 19:10:01 | 显示全部楼层
Reasons from Science for Limiting Classical Logic are especially given from physics; even if I think that other areas (Philosophy of Science, Epistemology, Action theory, Ethics... etc.) lead to similar or to the same limitations which are proposed here.. In general problems arise when logic is applied to fields outside logic and mathematics. Thes
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 06:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表