找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?; Paul Weingartner Book 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004 Combinatory Logic.Interpreta

[复制链接]
查看: 14271|回复: 58
发表于 2025-3-21 19:36:17 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?
影响因子2023Paul Weingartner
视频video
发行地址This is a thorough review..For many years nothing of that kind has been published..But the logical concepts to be used in various disciplines is heavily discussed in the more specialized treatises..He
图书封面Titlebook: Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?;  Paul Weingartner Book 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004 Combinatory Logic.Interpreta
影响因子.Initially proposed as rivals of classical logic, alternative logics have become increasingly important in sciences such as quantum physics, computer science, and artificial intelligence. The contributions collected in this volume address and explore the question whether the usage of logic in the sciences, especially in modern physics, requires a deviation from classical mathematical logic. The articles in the first part of the book set the scene by describing the context and the dilemma when applying logic in science. In part II the authors offer several logics that deviate in different ways from classical logics. The twelve papers in part III investigate in detail specific aspects such as quantum logic, quantum computation, computer-science considerations, praxic logic, and quantum probability. Most of the contributions are revised and partially extended versions of papers presented at a conference of the same title of the Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences held at the Internationales Forschungszentrum Salzburg in May 1999. Others have been added to complete the picture of recent research in alternative logics as they have been developed for applications in the s
Pindex Book 2004
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?网络公开度




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?被引频次




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?年度引用




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?读者反馈




书目名称Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:19:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:28:22 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44736-8etaphysics. From the beginning we encounter a mess of difficulties. If we focus our attention on the meaning of the term, we shall find that it is polysemic. Some of its significations are obscure, and not a few even absurd.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:22:01 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44736-8vent or relativity and quantum theories, had occurred which clearly upset much of what has become known as classical physics. But these new theories seemed to carry much more in the way of implications. For not only the classical scientific theories, but also the classical philosophies which attempt
发表于 2025-3-22 11:37:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:51:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:41:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:39:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:51:41 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45860-9 more adequate than classical propositional and first-order logics. Not surprisingly, answering this question usually amounts to a trade-off between the expressive power of the new logic (usually stronger than the expressive power of classical logic) and its decidability properties (usually weaker).
发表于 2025-3-23 08:58:52 | 显示全部楼层
Diamagnetic bulk susceptibility data of CF4,ocedures in the wider sense of self-consistency, adequacy and interconnections between various schemes of thought. This is a reasonable point of view if we accept Peirce’s claim that “according to its nature [logic] is forced to proceed with its research into the condition of reality itself and in d
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-15 22:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表