Titlebook: Women, Work, and Health: Challenges to Corporate Policy; Diana Chapman Walsh,Richard H. Egdahl Book 1980 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 198

debble

Special Needs of Women in Health Examinationsited States today, only 9.8 percent of all physicians are female, and of these, relatively few are in teaching positions. Medical textbooks published quite recently continue to describe women as passive, willing to suffer, self-sacrificing, and masochistic.. There is a general attitude among medical

alcoholism

Emasculate

A Legal Perspective on Workplace Reproductive Hazardsficant emphasis on toxins in the workplace and their effect on health. One of the problems industry must now face is the impact of occupational toxins on the reproductive systems of employees. This concern cannot be limited solely to females, since some agents affect the male directly and some affec

平静生活

The Biology of Toxic Effects on Reproductive Outcomeslbirth. In the vast majority of these cases—perhaps up to 70 percent.—the cause is not known. Hundreds of agents capable of producing such effects have been identified,. including many found in the workplace, but their actual impact on human reproduction has not been quantified.

多节

Evaluation and Control of Embryofetotoxic Substances exposures. Rather, it arises from substances that can cross the placenta and, at concentrations that would have no adverse effect on any adult, cause damage to the developing embryo or fetus. The female is involved only because it is she who carries the unborn child. Determining the potential risk

CRATE

Fetotoxicity and Fertile Female Employeesery year. Women at work today number 42.8 million, compared with only 18 million in 1950. By 1990 they are expected to number 54 million. The majority of working women are of childbearing age—between 16 and 50. These fertile female employees carry approximately 1 million prenatal infants in American

揉杂

palliative-care

A Legal Perspective on Pregnancy Leave and Benefits host of administrative agency and court actions involving, in one form or another, the question of whether employers may accord differential benefit treatment to pregnancy—as compared with other “traditional” temporary disabilities—without violating the sex discrimination prohibition contained in T

affect

中和

Sex Discrimination in Group Pensions their male counterparts for retirement plan purposes is guilty of sex discrimination. It is the purpose of this chapter to explore the legality of sex differentials in retirement plans as a vehicle for illustrating broader issues of workplace sex discrimination.*