LAST 发表于 2025-3-25 06:27:07
Problems at the Basis of Susan Haack’s Foundherentismermediate position between foundationalism and coherentism that leads to a solution of well-known problems these standard accounts face. In our paper, we discuss Haack’s foundherentism and argue that it shares an important trait with foundationalism, a trait that is at the core of one of the biggest压舱物 发表于 2025-3-25 08:35:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_22.pngDiskectomy 发表于 2025-3-25 14:01:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_23.png戏服 发表于 2025-3-25 17:45:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_24.pngNATAL 发表于 2025-3-25 22:29:22
Lessons in Multiculturalism and Objectivity? Puzzling Out Susan Haack’s Philosophy of Educationenhance students’ ability to discern (non-)conventional elements within their belief systems, and to examine their convictions critically. In our paper, we pursue two objectives: first, we interpret Haack as implicitly adopting critical thinking as a crucial educational aim. Second, we expose a fundovation 发表于 2025-3-26 03:19:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_26.png一致性 发表于 2025-3-26 06:55:29
Evaluating Philosophy: Susan Haack’s Contribution to Academic Ethicsuct Haack’s critique of what she calls “preposterism” in academia. ., we focus on the measurement of academic quality of philosophical work, scholars, or institutions through surrogate measures. We try to show that a total refusal of surrogate measures in academia is no solution, but that using thesPudendal-Nerve 发表于 2025-3-26 09:26:09
The Role of Experience in Empirical Justification: Response to Nikolai Ruppert, Riske Schlüter, and , outside, among scientists, legal scholars, historians, etc. I was especially glad that so many of these readers had found my ideas helpful in their fields. But somehow I wasn’t greatly surprised that—despite Hilary Putnam’s comment on the back cover that Popper, Quine, Rorty, Goldman, the Churchladefuse 发表于 2025-3-26 14:54:02
The Real, the Fictional, and the Somewhere-in-Between: Response to Julia Friederike Göhner, Tim Grafrfeldt focus—ideas about fictional characters, and specifically about the fictionalized versions of real people, places, etc., that sometimes turn up in works of fiction—are only a kind of codicil to the central themes of the much more comprehensive metaphysical theory I call Innocent Realism; and tForehead-Lift 发表于 2025-3-26 20:35:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_30.png