间谍活动
发表于 2025-3-30 10:32:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_51.png
粗鲁的人
发表于 2025-3-30 13:39:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_52.png
Dawdle
发表于 2025-3-30 17:51:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_53.png
谷物
发表于 2025-3-30 21:04:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_54.png
羊栏
发表于 2025-3-31 01:55:00
Susan Haack: Reintegrating Philosophy978-3-319-24969-8Series ISSN 2367-0991 Series E-ISSN 2367-1009
贪婪性
发表于 2025-3-31 08:42:28
Deviant Rules: On Susan Haack’s “The Justification of Deduction”The conditional defined by the combination of the two rules fails to satisfy the inversion principle due to Dag Prawitz, it fails to satisfy certain principles of the inferential truth theory due to Neil Tennant, there can be no truth table for it, and last but not least, it leads to inconsistency i
Junction
发表于 2025-3-31 12:30:40
The Grounds of Logic: Response to Sascha Bloch, Martin Pleitz, Markus Pohlman, and Jakob Wrobelential truth-theory,” and considerations about the truth-table for “→,” Bloch et al. show that the introduction rule and the elimination rule for . are, to put it mildly, . in harmony. No wonder, then that (like Arthur Prior’s rogue connective, “tonk”) . would wreak havoc in any logical system. My s
Accommodation
发表于 2025-3-31 16:25:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/89/8828/882769/882769_58.png