契约
发表于 2025-3-21 17:47:24
书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siecle读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0866242<br><br> <br><br>
finite
发表于 2025-3-22 00:17:35
Introduction,To capture a sense of the distinctiveness of the film ., Jack Kroll in a . item offers a parody of Sonnet 18. In his rewriting, the sonnet’s object of praise becomes cinematic artifact rather than mysterious lover:
demote
发表于 2025-3-22 02:13:37
http://image.papertrans.cn/s/image/866242.jpg
伟大
发表于 2025-3-22 07:40:44
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286795culture; film; technology
极少
发表于 2025-3-22 11:38:46
Mark Thornton Burnett (Reader in English),Ramona W
FLOAT
发表于 2025-3-22 13:11:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8663/866242/866242_6.png
painkillers
发表于 2025-3-22 17:27:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8663/866242/866242_7.png
诱导
发表于 2025-3-23 00:34:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8663/866242/866242_8.png
运动吧
发表于 2025-3-23 03:38:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8663/866242/866242_9.png
驳船
发表于 2025-3-23 06:27:53
,The Postmodern Theatre of Paul Mazursky’s ,, and unhelpful, for Mazursky’s . remains not only an aesthetically satisfying work, but one which meaningfully charts the status of the aesthetic in the globalized culture of the late twentieth century. Indeed, in its focus on the increasingly private visuality which has accompanied our ‘high degree