珍奇 发表于 2025-3-27 00:40:45

Introduction: Romanticism Lostowledges that any such claim is “impossible to prove” by “objective criteria.” A comparable amount of high-quality work is focused on other periods as well—“Baroque, renaissance, or medieval topics,” for example—but de Man insists nonetheless that Romanticism is a special case:

令人不快 发表于 2025-3-27 03:36:33

critical practice is problematically if not dangerously low, and the qualities which the Romantics valued in an engagement with Shakespeare are either ignored these days or fundamentally misunderstood.978-1-349-29581-4978-0-230-11936-9

Gastric 发表于 2025-3-27 06:29:55

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866175/866175_33.png

faultfinder 发表于 2025-3-27 12:43:28

Book 2011n on which to build our work.  This book asserts that among Shakespeareans at present, the level of conviction required to sustain a healthy critical practice is problematically if not dangerously low, and the qualities which the Romantics valued in an engagement with Shakespeare are either ignored

Employee 发表于 2025-3-27 16:34:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866175/866175_35.png

Saline 发表于 2025-3-27 20:03:22

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866175/866175_36.png

nocturia 发表于 2025-3-27 22:49:05

Introduction: Discipline and Desire particular the kind undertaken by the members of English departments and, more particularly still, by the Shakespeareans inhabiting these (and sometimes theater) departments. The word has no direct connection with inflicting or receiving pain, and any indirect connection, while perhaps interesting

共和国 发表于 2025-3-28 04:55:03

Return of the Aesthetic?it of the voice crying in the wilderness, but this wilderness is well populated with other voices; a significant number of critics have, in recent years, been similarly lamenting our apostasy from (or at least “losing sight of”) the core values of our discipline—the experience of “literary power,” w

斑驳 发表于 2025-3-28 08:52:42

Negative Desire: Materialism and Its Discontentswe keep trying. Disciplinary inertia must be an issue again, pulling now in the opposite direction from where it was pushing earlier on: instead of preventing us from a return to aesthetics, it prevents us from dropping the project. (As Kuhn says, humanists tend to throw nothing out.) But inertia ca

BRACE 发表于 2025-3-28 11:24:34

Introduction: What’s Wrong with Literature?., et al.), produced by the British publisher Orion. Orion’s publicity touts the “passionate romance, thrilling adventure, arresting characters and unforgettable scenes and situations” available in “the great classics,” but acknowledges that “finding time to read them can be a problem” (66). Gopnik
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Shakespeare Studies Today; Romanticism Lost Edward Pechter Book 2011 Edward Pechter 2011 Autorschaft.English literature.Romanticism.William