amphibian 发表于 2025-3-28 17:34:02

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866175/866175_41.png

Paradox 发表于 2025-3-28 18:50:15

New Textualism and the Crisis in Editinging” as the topic for discussion. McLeod’s own piece on “UN . Shak-speare” had appeared six years earlier, and a year after that Gary Taylor and Michael Warren had come out with ., an influential collection of essays many of which asked Shakespeareans to take on the idea that the Quarto and Folio ve

Calibrate 发表于 2025-3-29 02:56:51

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866175/866175_43.png

anchor 发表于 2025-3-29 05:23:45

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866175/866175_44.png

myelography 发表于 2025-3-29 09:58:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/87/8662/866175/866175_45.png

极大的痛苦 发表于 2025-3-29 15:26:32

Conclusion University in Montreal during the winter term of 1997. One evening after the class, a student—call him Sean—came into my office and sat down to talk. I expected him to be looking for clarification about the discussion just ended or about a future assignment, but instead he asked me whether, in defi

勉强 发表于 2025-3-29 18:06:01

Return of the Aesthetic?ear called . (Rasmussen) and . (Cohen); MLA sessions are devoted to a “new formalism,” and a critical mass of interest develops around this idea to the point where the . commissions a full-scale reflection on the question “What Is New Formalism?” for its regularly scheduled section on . (Levinson).
页: 1 2 3 4 [5]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Shakespeare Studies Today; Romanticism Lost Edward Pechter Book 2011 Edward Pechter 2011 Autorschaft.English literature.Romanticism.William