针叶
发表于 2025-3-26 22:22:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_31.png
ornithology
发表于 2025-3-27 01:18:54
,‘A Philosopher at Randome’: Translating Jacob Böhme in Seventeenth-Century Cambridge,ing Böhme in England. Second, I discuss the strategies of readers and translators of Böhme active in seventeenth-century Cambridge. Third, I compare the approaches of two main readers, Henry More and Charles Hotham, demonstrating that they were aware of the gap that had opened between the ‘German Bö
Provenance
发表于 2025-3-27 07:04:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_33.png
HALL
发表于 2025-3-27 10:50:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_34.png
SHRIK
发表于 2025-3-27 15:14:30
,‘Have Ye Not Heard That We Cannot Serve Two Masters?’: The Platonism of Mary Wollstonecraft,e her eclectic in her use of ideas and argument. She seems however to have been inspired by conceptions of the soul, love, truth and virtue that have their origins in Platonism. Considering her in this light provides greater insights into her philosophy of mind as well as her social and political vi
Strength
发表于 2025-3-27 19:49:13
,‘This Is Not Quite Fair, Master More!’: Coleridge and the Cambridge Platonists,oncludes with a brief consideration of the theme of the pre-existence of the soul. Despite the apparently radical nature of Coleridge’s transition from Unitarianism to Trinitarianism, it emerges that his maintenance of interest in the historical scholarship of Cudworth and the poetry and philosophy
obeisance
发表于 2025-3-27 23:42:41
,‘A Track Pursuing Not Untrod Before’: Wordsworth, Plato and the Cambridge Platonists,nation of . in the light of Cambridge Platonist thought follows, and reveals a surprising degree of affinity across a range of ideas: the primacy of Reason, the unity of the laws of mind and nature, the idea of a plastic nature, as well as Reason delivering moral absolutes, the senses rejected as a
fallible
发表于 2025-3-28 05:48:43
,The Legacy of a ‘Living Library’: On the Reception of John Smith,s Jones, Pierre Hadot, and others. This chapter, offers a broad, but highly selective, overview of the reception and influence of Smith’s life and work. It is intended, however, as a call for future research more than as an authoritative presentation of Smith’s legacy. For, if the Cambridge Platonis
DENT
发表于 2025-3-28 08:29:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_39.png
杀虫剂
发表于 2025-3-28 14:14:09
Book 2019f expertise from across the following disciplines: philosophy, Neoplatonic studies, religious studies, intellectual history, seventeenth-century literature, women’s writing, and dissenting studies.The essays were originally presented at a series of workshops in Cambridge on the Cambridge Platonists funded by the AHRC..