interrogate
发表于 2025-3-23 12:48:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_11.png
fulcrum
发表于 2025-3-23 16:28:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_12.png
大气层
发表于 2025-3-23 20:58:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_13.png
infarct
发表于 2025-3-23 22:13:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_14.png
Incommensurate
发表于 2025-3-24 04:30:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_15.png
GUISE
发表于 2025-3-24 09:15:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_16.png
Albinism
发表于 2025-3-24 10:44:54
,‘This Is Not Quite Fair, Master More!’: Coleridge and the Cambridge Platonists,ork for a thorough comparison of ideas. Both the Cambridge Platonists and Coleridge modified a strongly dualistic philosophical legacy, the former responding to Descartes, the latter to Kant. Indeed, Coleridge’s study of More, Cudworth and Smith took place in parallel with his engagement with German
傻瓜
发表于 2025-3-24 15:50:55
,‘A Track Pursuing Not Untrod Before’: Wordsworth, Plato and the Cambridge Platonists,commonplace associates his poetic decline with his gradual return to Christian orthodoxy. Even if true, his orthodoxy has many missing elements, and Wordsworth implicitly authorized a search for some philosophical or theological coherence in his work when he declared that an attentive reader of . wo
Amplify
发表于 2025-3-24 21:28:29
,The Legacy of a ‘Living Library’: On the Reception of John Smith,l those who followed after him well into the twentieth century and beyond. Well established lines of influence both to and from Whichcote, Cudworth, and More are explored first before moving on to less well-known connections to Bishop Simon Patrick and mathematician Isaac Barrow. Smith’s continued s
CLEFT
发表于 2025-3-25 02:57:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8299/829806/829806_20.png