architect
发表于 2025-3-21 16:38:45
书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Research and Innovation in Physics Education: Two Sides of the Same Coin读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0827906<br><br> <br><br>
安定
发表于 2025-3-21 23:15:34
Gorazd Planinšičent years have served to underline the deficiencies and excesses of markets and financial systems. Economic restructuring and market expansion that have occurred as a result of market liberalization policies have created new patterns of wealth and poverty as well as shifts in the levels and patterns
容易懂得
发表于 2025-3-22 03:40:13
Claudio Fazioical (and ongoing) impact of gender on the development of no.Drawing both on historical accounts of the emotions and on contemporary affect theory, this book explores the intersection of social constructions of sex and gender with the development of norms for emotive speech in literary texts from th
协定
发表于 2025-3-22 08:18:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8280/827906/827906_4.png
窝转脊椎动物
发表于 2025-3-22 09:46:17
Knut Neumannary subject. This nostalgia is manifested in both sides of recurrent feminist debates between procedural and substantive models of autonomy, in which the agency of the feminist subject is defined in terms of a ‘choosers’ or ‘losers’ paradigm. It can be traced in a range of arguments in feminist ethi
jaundiced
发表于 2025-3-22 12:58:44
María Gabriela Lorenzoas to empower women and make them ‘agents’ rather than ‘victims’; however, recasting the debate as one of ‘women’s choices’ has tended to obscure, and even justify, injustice. The focus on ‘choice’ has silenced other ethical concerns – in particular concerns about the ethics of practices and about t
CHOKE
发表于 2025-3-22 18:19:24
Mila Kryjevskaia,Nathaniel Grosznts two ongoing methodological dilemmas. How does conceiving women’s texts as collaborations between authors, readers, annotators, editors, printers, and patrons uphold or disrupt current understandings of authorship? And how does reconceiving such texts as collaborative illuminate some of the unre
babble
发表于 2025-3-22 22:52:05
Jenaro Guisasola,Kristina Zuza,Jaume Ametller,Paulo Sarriugartelaborative” in the form they have come down to us because our best records of them, in the absence of recording devices, are usually contemporary transcriptions by auditors. These are often lively and quite similar from one transcriber to another, which suggests that the transcriptions are fairly fa
终止
发表于 2025-3-23 04:46:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8280/827906/827906_9.png
发芽
发表于 2025-3-23 09:21:05
Ed van den Berg,Aernout van Rossum,Jeroen Grijsen,Henk Pol,Jan van der Veennts two ongoing methodological dilemmas. How does conceiving women’s texts as collaborations between authors, readers, annotators, editors, printers, and patrons uphold or disrupt current understandings of authorship? And how does reconceiving such texts as collaborative illuminate some of the unre