Uncultured 发表于 2025-3-28 16:16:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8245/824475/824475_41.pngmaculated 发表于 2025-3-28 20:21:16
Maximilian Ledochowskistently says that faith and doubt are “opposite passions” that exclude each other. I argue that this mistake is due to neglecting a distinction Kierkegaard makes between doubt and uncertainty. Uncertainty, understood as the compatibility of the falsity of a belief with its available evidence, is a r臆断 发表于 2025-3-28 23:03:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8245/824475/824475_43.pngAudiometry 发表于 2025-3-29 06:01:29
Maximilian Ledochowskiited his efforts in theoretical and practical philosophy. This is largely his own fault: in his discussion of the question he moves quickly from talking about rational hope to discussing the kind of Belief or faith (.) that grounds it. Moreover, the canonical statements of his own moral proof do notSEED 发表于 2025-3-29 08:46:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8245/824475/824475_45.pngTortuous 发表于 2025-3-29 14:46:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8245/824475/824475_46.pngModicum 发表于 2025-3-29 17:35:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8245/824475/824475_47.pngcreatine-kinase 发表于 2025-3-29 21:30:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8245/824475/824475_48.png统治人类 发表于 2025-3-30 00:07:01
Maximilian Ledochowskiertain conditions, be entitled to believe beyond the evidence. Second, we engaged with Cliffordian evidentialism, which maintains that it is always wrong to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence. This absolutist form of evidentialism was found to be weak. There were three considerations摊位 发表于 2025-3-30 04:11:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/83/8245/824475/824475_50.png