gene-therapy
发表于 2025-3-28 15:46:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661943/661943_41.png
STALL
发表于 2025-3-28 20:56:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661943/661943_42.png
Dorsal
发表于 2025-3-28 23:00:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661943/661943_43.png
Cougar
发表于 2025-3-29 05:53:24
Little Evolution, BIG Evolution: Rethinking the History of Darwinism, Population Genetics, and the “ “evolutionary synthesis.” By noting how Darwin, Galton, DeVries, Fisher, Wright, Haldane, Chetverikov, Severtsov, Filipchenko, Dobzhansky, Goldschmidt, J. Huxley, Mayr, Simpson, Guyénot, Rensch, and others understood the distinction, and the language and arguments they used, the article chronicles
lethal
发表于 2025-3-29 09:13:06
When Panpsychism Met Monism: Why Did the Philosopher Theodor Ziehen Become a Crucial Figure for the re philosopher who developed a very sophisticated and radical form of panpsychism. While Ziehen’s work left few traces within the history of philosophy itself, his epistemology enjoyed significant influence within German evolutionary biology. Most prominently, Ziehen had a great impact on the “co-ar
运动的我
发表于 2025-3-29 11:38:48
Inertia, Trend, and Momentum Reconsidered: G. G. Simpson—An Orthogeneticist? of orthogenesis in his discipline. Following the neo-Darwinian agenda, he thought that this theory had little basis to be proven. Since then, orthogenesis has been defined in textbooks as a “metaphysical,” “vitalistic,” or “theological” theory. However, in the present analysis, I demonstrate that S
骚动
发表于 2025-3-29 19:34:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661943/661943_47.png
臆断
发表于 2025-3-29 20:36:18
What’s Natural About Natural Selection?their immediate circumstances—it was also the agent provocateur of the pool of variation from which it chose these better-adapted features. Gradually, over immense amounts of time, the accumulation of these “infinitesimally small” adaptive changes would yield a new species. After Morgan successfully
责难
发表于 2025-3-30 03:30:44
Natural Selection, Morphoprocess and a Logical Field of Evolutionary Conceptssm. This tradition culminated in the paradigm of the Modern Synthesis. This study invites the reader to critically examine the precept that selectogenesis is the only possible framework for an evolutionary synthesis. Abundant data on the organisation of living systems at all levels, from molecules t
nullify
发表于 2025-3-30 04:59:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661943/661943_50.png