全部逛商店 发表于 2025-3-26 22:46:27
Natural Law and the Common GoodEtienne Gilson (1884–1978) recalls the sense of strangeness produced by his first contact with Thomistic philosophy in Sebastien Reinstadler’s ... Gilson, who studied at the Sorbonne with Brunschvicg and Lévy-Bruhl, was shocked by the bad manners of Reinstadler and the Scholastics who tended to label any opinion contradicting their own as absurd.Ablation 发表于 2025-3-27 04:19:58
The “Predicamental” PerspectiveAs an epilogue to the neo-Thomistic theory, it is helpful to explicate some of the meta-principles at work in the preceding explanations. Something like this reflection was traditionally included in Scholastic material logic under the rubric of “ante-predicaments” — the notions needed for understanding the functioning of the predicaments.严厉谴责 发表于 2025-3-27 05:19:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_33.pngcolloquial 发表于 2025-3-27 11:57:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8495-0Lenin; Leninism; Marx; logic; marxismCantankerous 发表于 2025-3-27 17:01:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_35.pngBlanch 发表于 2025-3-27 18:39:12
Meta-Marxismlanation and by his commitment to the view in question. The outsider can be accused of “dogmatism” for applying something “foreign” to what was to be explained. Even the “detached” or “neutral” observer has to declare a “standard” for comparison — which would be clearly a . in the most destructive (i.e., uncritical) sense.inquisitive 发表于 2025-3-28 00:10:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_37.png凶猛 发表于 2025-3-28 05:10:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_38.png远足 发表于 2025-3-28 09:13:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_39.pngVEN 发表于 2025-3-28 11:17:15
Science and Progresserence among philosophies is . that one of them has complete explanations and the others do not, but rather that one recognizes that explanations are partial and the others do not. This is but to reaffirm the importance of contextualism from another point of view.