男生戴手铐 发表于 2025-3-25 03:29:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_21.pngFacet-Joints 发表于 2025-3-25 09:30:17
978-94-009-8497-4D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1981痛打 发表于 2025-3-25 12:10:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_23.png离开 发表于 2025-3-25 19:20:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_24.pngpellagra 发表于 2025-3-25 23:28:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_25.pngemulsify 发表于 2025-3-26 01:23:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624947/624947_26.pngtolerance 发表于 2025-3-26 05:50:40
Contextxt?” These two questions are mutually antagonistic. Each keeps us from answering the other facilely. The issue is of crucial importance to philosophy as a whole. Indeed, the very meaning of “philosophy” hangs on the way these questions are answered.过滤 发表于 2025-3-26 09:34:56
Making Logic Practical proof and persuasion”.. He agrees with Bacon that learning consists in the growth of knowledge, and as such cannot be accomplished by syllogistic demonstration of what is .. Classic logic is inherently conservative, emphasizing and falling back on the authority and intellectual achievements of the past.火海 发表于 2025-3-26 13:47:01
Emergence of the “New Soviet Man”According to G. L. Smirnov, the notion of the “new Soviet man” marks the third stage in the evolution of the Soviet notion of the human person, following on the concept of “builder of Communism” which served as focus to the scholastic development of mainline Marxist-Leninist ethics.FANG 发表于 2025-3-26 17:07:02
The Scientific-Technological RevolutionWhen we call Marx’s own view of the social function of science and technology “humanist” we have in mind not only the contrast with the scientism of Engels, but also the more complex issue of Marx’s own understanding of science and technology as well as of the status of his work as scientific.