affront 发表于 2025-3-21 18:31:16

书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0583685<br><br>        <br><br>

发酵 发表于 2025-3-21 23:50:14

The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion,des a case. As a result the critical norms for evaluating argumentation are not applicable to a legal decision. In this contribution I will try to refute these two objections by showing how the ideals of a critical discussion relate to the ideals of the . and how these ideals function as starting po

光明正大 发表于 2025-3-22 01:56:26

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5837/583685/583685_3.png

conformity 发表于 2025-3-22 07:11:42

Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law,best . legal argument. This is the most attractive view, not in the least because its alternatives cannot well be defended. The most important objection against this view, that the best actual argument may lead to a wrong conclusion, is rejected because it presupposes that the legal consequences wer

alcohol-abuse 发表于 2025-3-22 09:23:12

Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive InteHart, 1994, Chap. 7). Herbert Hart suggested that, in those cases, judges act as surrogate legislatures by filling legal gaps. Indeed, this view is confirmed in this paper and made analytically clear: legal concepts can be holistically and inferentially characterized by arbitrarily large and connect

mediocrity 发表于 2025-3-22 13:55:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5837/583685/583685_6.png

文艺 发表于 2025-3-22 20:35:07

Carlos Bernal the quasi-inexistence of systematic and discursive – rather than activist – studies on the subject-matter, the analysis questions the appropriateness of this framework in efforts aimed at empo978-90-6704-976-4978-90-6704-609-1

构想 发表于 2025-3-22 22:23:36

http://reply.papertrans.cn/59/5837/583685/583685_8.png

delegate 发表于 2025-3-23 03:59:42

Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives

Mutter 发表于 2025-3-23 08:03:14

1572-4395 entation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany.  .978-94-017-8235-7978-94-007-4670-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives; Christian Dahlman,Eveline Feteris Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media D