Observe
发表于 2025-3-25 03:47:42
Remarks on Technological Progress, each other.. If technology were just a branch of science, then the philosophy of technology would likewise be just a branch of the philosophy of science. Therefore, the common definition of technology as ’applied science’ has served as one of the reasons why the philosophy of technology has had dif
gratify
发表于 2025-3-25 07:45:23
Book 1984the attempt to find a satisfactory explicate for the notion of tnithlike ness or verisimilitude. The technical results of this search have partly appeared elsewhere, and I am also working on a systematic presentation of them in a companion volume to this book: Truthlikeness (forthcoming hopefully i
eucalyptus
发表于 2025-3-25 13:43:00
0166-6991 pied with the attempt to find a satisfactory explicate for the notion of tnithlike ness or verisimilitude. The technical results of this search have partly appeared elsewhere, and I am also working on a systematic presentation of them in a companion volume to this book: Truthlikeness (forthcoming h
脖子
发表于 2025-3-25 16:57:51
The Nature of Science, of the most pertinent attempts to characterize science and the scientific method. It helps us to clarify the sense in which features such as objectivity, critical attitude, autonomy, and progress belong to the nature of science.
AVERT
发表于 2025-3-25 20:59:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_25.png
无孔
发表于 2025-3-26 00:12:50
Finalization, Applied Science, and Science Policy,continue to be heatedly disputed, it is natural to inquire whether the recent discussion about models of scientific change within philosophy of science can throw any light upon them.. This chapter deals with some aspects of this problem by giving special attention to the ‘finalization thesis’ of Böhme, van den Daele, and Krohn.
PAGAN
发表于 2025-3-26 08:12:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_27.png
外向者
发表于 2025-3-26 12:04:07
Scientific Progress,rence to its method; this method is thought to be sufficient to guarantee continuous progress for science or at least to give clear criteria for recognizing ‘progressive’ developments within science..
nerve-sparing
发表于 2025-3-26 13:53:48
Notes on Popper as Follower of Whewell and Peirce,hese thinkers we find ‘Kantians’ from Kant himself to J.F. Fries, William Whewell, and Ernst Apelt, ‘realists’ like Bernard Bolzano and Charles Sanders Peirce, ‘hermeneutic’ historians like Wilhelm Dilthey, and working scientists like Karl Marx..
任命
发表于 2025-3-26 19:29:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_30.png