错事 发表于 2025-3-23 10:03:32

0166-6991 fic American. This explains its programmatic character. It tries to give a compact answer to the question ‘What is science?‘, and serves therefore as an introdu978-90-481-8404-0978-94-017-1978-0Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

Lacunar-Stroke 发表于 2025-3-23 14:23:30

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_12.png

飞来飞去真休 发表于 2025-3-23 19:21:12

How is Philosophy Possible as a Science?, The position of philosophy is unique within the system of sciences and more generally within the whole human culture. Immanuel Kant’s famous question — how is philosophy possible as a science? — is a permanently topical theme on which all researchers, teachers, and practitioners of philosophy have

Pituitary-Gland 发表于 2025-3-24 01:00:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_14.png

neuron 发表于 2025-3-24 05:42:46

The Evolution of Knowledge,uman knowledge is viewed from a dynamic perspective. I shall restrict my attention mainly on the question concerning scientific knowledge and its development. In particular, I shall discuss attempts by some philosophers to analyse the growth of scientific knowledge by using ideas and concepts from t

出没 发表于 2025-3-24 09:29:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_16.png

技术 发表于 2025-3-24 13:25:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_17.png

atrophy 发表于 2025-3-24 15:17:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_18.png

水獭 发表于 2025-3-24 22:39:53

Finalization, Applied Science, and Science Policy,s a rational science policy possible? Are attempts to guide the development of science harmful to the autonomy of science? While questions like these continue to be heatedly disputed, it is natural to inquire whether the recent discussion about models of scientific change within philosophy of scienc

Evocative 发表于 2025-3-25 02:55:26

http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475500/475500_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Is Science Progressive?; Ilkka Niiniluoto Book 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984 Karl R. Popper.idea.knowledge.policy.re