费解 发表于 2025-3-23 11:25:03
What Good is Truth?,lues, the good of knowledge lends itself to a special argument — an argument directed against people who assail the ranking of knowledge as a good.. Finnis maintains that anyone who seriously denies the goodness of truth or knowledge must contradict herself flagrantly in the act of putting forth her丑恶 发表于 2025-3-23 14:38:28
How Not to Oppugn Consequentialism,s who evaluate each action by reference to the consequences or states of affairs which the action brings about;. on the latter side are philosophers who evaluate each action by reference to its accordance or disaccordance with entitlements and obligations that obtain irrespective of the consequencesOMIT 发表于 2025-3-23 19:00:24
Justice as Constancy,of those phenomena. Not least important is the distinction between the substantive aspects and the procedural or formal aspects of law and justice. Claims about the moral import of law will prove to be untenable if they give insufficient heed to the form/substance gap. My current discussion, which iEnrage 发表于 2025-3-23 22:34:59
,Questions Raised and Questions Begged: Some Doubts about Ronald Dworkin’s Approach to Law-and-Econoctices of interpretation, and he likewise submits that the Anglo-American legal tradition should be seen as fundamentally shaped by the ideal of equality. Nowhere does his combination of views emerge more piquantly than in his book’s eighth chapter, entitled ‘The Common Law’. Dworkin there grants thidiopathic 发表于 2025-3-24 04:52:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4632/463108/463108_15.pngFantasy 发表于 2025-3-24 09:30:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4632/463108/463108_16.pngAgronomy 发表于 2025-3-24 12:32:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4632/463108/463108_17.pngPtosis 发表于 2025-3-24 18:01:45
,Of Aristotle and Ice Cream Cones: Reflections on Jules Coleman’s Theory of Corrective justice,ere has been a good deal of overlapping and repetition among those writings, there have also occurred some major shifts in Coleman’s positions. One of the aims of the present essay is to determine whether the transformations in Coleman’s thinking have been entirely salutary.Carbon-Monoxide 发表于 2025-3-24 19:35:44
,Getting the Rabbit Out of the Hat: A Critique of Anthony Kronman’s Theory of Contract,hilosophy of private law’.. Kronman’s article has received a great deal of attention on both sides of the Atlantic, and it has helped to sharpen the debate between libertarianism and other forms of liberalism. In the present essay, we shall seek to expose two major weaknesses in Kronman’s arguments模范 发表于 2025-3-25 02:49:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4632/463108/463108_20.png