胖人手艺好
发表于 2025-3-28 18:37:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4632/463108/463108_41.png
Jejune
发表于 2025-3-28 22:18:29
How Not to Oppugn Consequentialism,ia the construction of scenarios in which the assailed position leads to ghastly results. Roughly as of ten, the discrediting proceeds through revelations (or putative revelations) of analytical shortcomings.
Initiative
发表于 2025-3-29 02:45:36
,Questions Raised and Questions Begged: Some Doubts about Ronald Dworkin’s Approach to Law-and-Econon can best be interpreted as the pursuit of wealth-maximization. Pitting himself against the economic approach to legal matters, he holds that we ought to understand market-simulation as the achievement or pursuit of equality.
过于平凡
发表于 2025-3-29 05:32:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4632/463108/463108_44.png
原谅
发表于 2025-3-29 10:30:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4632/463108/463108_45.png
irreparable
发表于 2025-3-29 11:56:02
Book 1999ald Coase and Richard Posner). Among the many topics covered by Kramer‘s essays are the relative merits of legal positivism and natural-law theory, the appropriate understanding of justice, the role of consequences in moral decision-making, and the ultimate foundations of moral judgements.