琐碎
发表于 2025-3-27 00:44:05
Bethany Jill Williams,Darren Treanoreed, Koyré is still nowadays an almost unavoidable reference point for Kepler’s .. We refer to several interpretations of his. This is the reason why we think appropriate to present this work in homage to Alexandre Koyré.
易达到
发表于 2025-3-27 03:22:56
Whole-Body FDG PET Imaging in Oncologyhers about the intricate links between present and past. In 1946 he stated that “the reality of time” could only be revealed through transformations and, at the same time, that there was only past from the stance of a present. Therefore, an epistemological transformation in the present called for a
RAGE
发表于 2025-3-27 07:15:24
The Wheat in the View of Our Whole-Menu,lural), his loosening of Koyré’s central category of “metaphysics,” and his invention of the crucial conception of “normal science.” Additionally, Kuhn’s devotion to Koyré explains some historiographical pitfalls and blind spots that bedeviled his historical work: for example, his ignoring early mod
shrill
发表于 2025-3-27 09:38:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4308/430800/430800_34.png
Tremor
发表于 2025-3-27 15:10:11
Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science978-3-319-61712-1
hyperuricemia
发表于 2025-3-27 19:05:02
ers much-needed insights into the subject from historical, nature of science, and philosophical perspectives. It provides an absorbing and revealing read for historians, philosophers and scientists alike.978-3-319-87141-7978-3-319-61712-1
Urologist
发表于 2025-3-28 01:36:46
Book 2018fluence. The book brings together contributions from leading experts in the field, and offers much-needed insights into the subject from historical, nature of science, and philosophical perspectives. It provides an absorbing and revealing read for historians, philosophers and scientists alike.
六边形
发表于 2025-3-28 03:43:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4308/430800/430800_38.png
莎草
发表于 2025-3-28 06:56:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4308/430800/430800_39.png
Delirium
发表于 2025-3-28 14:07:50
,Alexandre Koyré’s Essential Features of the Scientific Revolution, to reduce his initial dual characterization to one single formula. I argue here that, on the contrary, the duality of description had a special meaning which permits us to keep in focus the complexity of the intellectual change that occurred during the seventeenth century, when a new science was ri