动词 发表于 2025-3-21 17:32:11

书目名称How Philosophers Argue影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue网络公开度<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue被引频次<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue被引频次学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue年度引用<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue年度引用学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue读者反馈<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称How Philosophers Argue读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0428676<br><br>        <br><br>

hieroglyphic 发表于 2025-3-21 22:30:35

http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_2.png

novelty 发表于 2025-3-22 03:13:50

http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_3.png

Acupressure 发表于 2025-3-22 06:30:16

Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston’s Moral Argumentourism. Although noticeable points of contact appear now and then, none of the debaters take advantage of them and so the debate on the moral argument is as inconclusive as that on the metaphysical argument.

ASSET 发表于 2025-3-22 11:03:37

Argument Dialectiche logical perspective understands and evaluates arguments as products that people create. My analysis is logical in that it focuses on intra. and inter.argumentative relations, and at the same time it is dialectical in that it places at the core the relations of opposition between arguments.

cardiovascular 发表于 2025-3-22 15:16:54

Argumentation Structures and Operations simple or complex. Thus, e.g. the operation of concatenation yields a subordinative argument. The successive interventions of the participants in an argumentative exchange can be seen as applications of these operations, by means of which participants interactively weave a macro-argument in the course of an argumentative exchange.

变态 发表于 2025-3-22 19:52:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_7.png

把…比做 发表于 2025-3-22 23:33:19

Co-Oriented Reasons and Modifierson stand of fall independently of one another, whereas in conjunction reasons add up. Consequently, disjunction may be a reply either to an objection or a rebuttal of an argument, while conjunction may be a reply to a refutation.

Proponent 发表于 2025-3-23 02:00:31

Intertwined Structurestive exchange. Every countermove amounts to the application of an operation that produces a new argumentative structure. In this way, an abstract structure formed by arguments and counter-arguments can be extracted from the argumentative process.

纯朴 发表于 2025-3-23 08:29:52

http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: How Philosophers Argue; An Adversarial Colla Fernando Leal,Hubert Marraud Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under