BIPED
发表于 2025-3-23 12:37:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_11.png
变形
发表于 2025-3-23 16:40:04
Description of the Method Followedfew concepts are added to tie up the matter of questions with the fundamental concepts of standpoint and difference of opinion. Then the role of questioning within the ideal model of a critical discussion is tackled. Finally, all these developments are used to present an overview of the Russell–Copleston debate to be analysed in Chaps. .–..
全国性
发表于 2025-3-23 18:10:36
Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston’s Religious Argumentopleston starts with a reasonably clear example of what he calls religious experience, Russell keeps substituting different kinds of experience which appear to be quite unlike that intended by Copleston. The debate is never really engaged in the original terms and slowly shifts towards the moral argument.
小虫
发表于 2025-3-24 01:50:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_14.png
子女
发表于 2025-3-24 05:47:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_15.png
Obliterate
发表于 2025-3-24 10:28:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_16.png
GRILL
发表于 2025-3-24 11:12:31
How Philosophers Argue978-3-030-85368-6Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
Hirsutism
发表于 2025-3-24 15:29:38
Introduction,tage point of two different argumentation theories, pragma-dialectics (van Eemeren, 2018) and argument dialectics (Marraud, 2020c); next to justify why we chose precisely that text; and finally, to explain briefly the way in which we performed the analysis, namely by what is called "adversarial collaboration" (Kahneman, 2013).
清楚说话
发表于 2025-3-24 19:50:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428676/428676_19.png
Complement
发表于 2025-3-25 00:51:21
Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments but dwells especially on the metaphysical argument, which he considers the strongest. He also objects to the intrusion of formal mathematical logic in a metaphysical issue. Russell for his part rejects this objection and repeats the main arguments against Copleston’s position.