brassy 发表于 2025-3-26 22:34:54
Introduction: Where Angels Fear,stion, I want to maintain, against the tradition which holds that ‘ought’ implies ‘can’, that some oughts may be positively uncanny. Or rather, I want to argue that ‘ought’ does not entail ‘can’ (i. e., I want to argue against the OES supposition) — insofar as ‘can’ is used in such a way that the de万灵丹 发表于 2025-3-27 02:26:39
A Leontief Technology for the Regionhis last concept devoid of any possible application — as indeed C. D. Broad, for one, argued long ago..This, it must be emphasized, is a purely conceptual point, and is independent of the extent to which events in our world are, or are found to be, subsumable under causal laws. Since we do in fact s蜈蚣 发表于 2025-3-27 05:58:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_33.pngrods366 发表于 2025-3-27 10:18:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_34.png蛤肉 发表于 2025-3-27 17:27:02
Cynthia A. Paszkowski,William M. Tonn one ought (not) to do depends solely on what God wills. I shall discuss this view in part because of its historical practical importance, but principally because it represents a kind of position in terms of which there is but a single right-making consideration. I have already made clear my skeptic无关紧要 发表于 2025-3-27 21:31:35
Practical Reasoning, Action, and Weakness of Will,be practical in the Aristotelian sense of being directed to practice: one may have a theoretical curiosity in determining whether a given action was, overall, a suitable one, whether, e. g., Socrates did the right thing in refusing the opportunity to escape. Many philosophers suggest that one’s inte项目 发表于 2025-3-27 23:45:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_37.pngbourgeois 发表于 2025-3-28 05:58:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_38.pngCOMMA 发表于 2025-3-28 06:35:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_39.pngMirage 发表于 2025-3-28 13:34:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_40.png