Ordeal 发表于 2025-3-23 11:27:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_11.png浪费时间 发表于 2025-3-23 17:45:24
,“With God All is Permitted”,ism about the tenability of any such single-principle views. Part of my argument is designed to show the unacceptability of any view which holds that ‘oughtness’ is defined in terms of or otherwise constituted by the subjective reaction (e. g., approval) of any observer, divine or human, actual or ideal.Pigeon 发表于 2025-3-23 21:56:35
978-94-009-7079-3D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1983控诉 发表于 2025-3-23 22:32:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_14.pngGLIDE 发表于 2025-3-24 05:56:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7077-9Plato; moral philosophy; morality; skepticismSPURN 发表于 2025-3-24 07:15:38
Introduction,e above title bear at least a superficial similarity to that famous triad which Kant took to be presupposed by practical reasoning, viz., God, freedom and immortality. Of this last notion I shall say nothing in the sequel; within the Kantian worldview, at any rate, it is so closely tied to that of G或者发神韵 发表于 2025-3-24 13:54:49
Practical Reasoning, Action, and Weakness of Will,cal reasoning’. There are judgments expressible in sentences of the form ’All things considered, P ought (not) to perform (have performed, be performing) A’. Any such judgment I shall call a practical judgment. On this usage, it is a practical judgment, e. g., that, all th贸易 发表于 2025-3-24 18:20:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_18.pngHeart-Attack 发表于 2025-3-24 19:12:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3873/387210/387210_19.png神圣不可 发表于 2025-3-25 00:34:33
The Fly in the Flypaper,philosophical perplexity is one important philosophical task, one, indeed, which is a major part of my concern with the freewill problem. Now the process of clarification may, for some philosophical puzzles, be adequately represented by Wittgenstein’s image, but I suggest the image of the fly in the