Trabeculoplasty
发表于 2025-3-30 09:41:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_51.png
大方不好
发表于 2025-3-30 14:19:28
,The Identity of Man – Winch Between Spinoza, Weil, and Wittgenstein,rences on a diverse range of issues in his works, but also by several lectures and seminars he delivered on this thinker. A reconstruction of his interpretation of Spinoza’s system, which unites epistemological, metaphysical and ethical considerations as mutually dependent, brings to the fore Winch’
卷发
发表于 2025-3-30 17:08:14
,Weil and Wittgenstein in Winch’s “Reading”: Philosophy as a Way of Life,ncepts developed independently by Wittgenstein. The comparative analysis illustrates that for both these Socratic philosophers, theory corresponds to daily experience, a real “way of life” which in itself gives rise to an ethical-philosophical pragmatics that informs the most intimate ontological di
POLYP
发表于 2025-3-30 21:46:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_54.png
Binge-Drinking
发表于 2025-3-31 01:03:22
,Between Discovery and Decision: Winch’s Critique of the Universalizability of Moral Judgment Revisin superseded, in fact, on closer examination it presents a viewpoint which is missing from modern mainstream metaethics. I will first review Winch’s criticism of the universalizability thesis, then examine some responses to that criticism. Finally, I will reconsider Winch’s proposals from a differen
身心疲惫
发表于 2025-3-31 08:25:03
,The Good and Bad in Sexual Relations: A Reconsideration of Winch’s Limiting Notions,death, are not to be considered as events or experiences in the world, but rather as having a more fundamental role in shaping what we make sense of as human life and morality. In this article, I discuss some senses in which sexual relations, perceived as such a “limiting notion”, can be said to “de
无礼回复
发表于 2025-3-31 11:51:59
Winch on First Philosophy: Unity and Multiplicity,ganizer(s), that there might be scientifically determinable foundations for a universal human morality. “I do not know exactly how Professor Schnädelbach himself conceives this matter”, he concedes. But Winch’s preferred model, if you will permit me something obvious, is “hese phenomena have no o