Antagonism 发表于 2025-3-26 21:46:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_31.pngHdl348 发表于 2025-3-27 01:07:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_32.pngGrasping 发表于 2025-3-27 08:51:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_33.pngYag-Capsulotomy 发表于 2025-3-27 10:31:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_34.pngGingivitis 发表于 2025-3-27 16:57:11
Moral Agency,is a fact that someone abused their authority, then they are answerable both to themselves and to others for their lack of integrity. And although the principles of morality may differ radically at different times and across different cultures, this does not imply any simplistic relativism in the un阉割 发表于 2025-3-27 20:43:46
,“What Justifies the Justifications?” Winch on Punishment and Justice,larify this argument, partly by reference to the distinction between punishment and revenge. I end by discussing a problematic remark of Winch’s in which he seems once more to open up the possibility of asking for a wholesale justification of punishment.我不重要 发表于 2025-3-28 01:00:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_37.pngHippocampus 发表于 2025-3-28 02:48:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3162/316119/316119_38.pngSLUMP 发表于 2025-3-28 07:36:14
Winch on First Philosophy: Unity and Multiplicity,inch’s hands, a fundamental challenge to the standard history and practice of philosophy. In his 1987 paper, “Einheit: Voraussetzung oder Forderung”, Winch applies these principles to the example of an empirical foundationalism, which expects the social sciences to discover ‘cultural universals’ onOVER 发表于 2025-3-28 14:30:45
,Researching Education: Perspectives from Winch’s Approach to the Social Sciences,distinction is drawn between the concept of education and various operative conceptions which are the province of the empirical as well as the normative researcher. This approach to the study of education is illustrated through an extended example and the possibilities for an empirical investigation