Nutraceutical
发表于 2025-3-21 19:41:01
书目名称Epistemic Pluralism影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Epistemic Pluralism读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0313311<br><br> <br><br>
策略
发表于 2025-3-22 00:15:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_2.png
收藏品
发表于 2025-3-22 03:27:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_3.png
Onerous
发表于 2025-3-22 04:53:56
How to Be a Pluralist About Self-Knowledgedorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi
Debark
发表于 2025-3-22 12:20:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_5.png
改正
发表于 2025-3-22 15:41:15
2946-2851 nt, self-knowledge and the status of philosophical disputes about ontology) this fascinating new volume is essential reading for scholars, researchers and advanced students in the discipline..978-3-319-88034-1978-3-319-65460-7Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
改正
发表于 2025-3-22 18:54:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7936-9 do two things. First, I explain why the distinction between epistemic monism and epistemic pluralism is most interestingly drawn at the level of non-derivative epistemic goods. Second, I make the observation that, at a very fundamental level, the varieties of epistemic pluralism presented in Sect.
ERUPT
发表于 2025-3-22 21:43:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_8.png
–吃
发表于 2025-3-23 04:52:33
L. Szilágyi,S. M. Szilágyi,Z. Benyóhe locality of rational evaluation (in conjunction with a reasonable appreciation of epistemic diversity) commits the Wittgenstenian to a further epistemic incommensurability thesis. Next, Duncan Pritchard’s (e.g. 2009; 2015) novel attempt to save the hinge epistemologist from a commitment to episte
MITE
发表于 2025-3-23 09:04:35
Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Controldorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi