amorphous 发表于 2025-3-23 13:27:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_11.png激怒某人 发表于 2025-3-23 15:37:38
How to Be a Pluralist About Disagreementxastic disagreement. One such pluralist account, developed out of John MacFarlane’s work, is . .. I criticise Disjunctive Pluralism and argue for an alternative pluralist theory of disagreement that I call . .. Moreover, I argue that kinship pluralism can be adequately extended to other varieties of disagreement, namely . and . disagreement.有权威 发表于 2025-3-23 19:49:12
A Pluralistic Way Out of Epistemic Deflationism About Ontological Disputestical features and virtues that is “internal” to each position. I will urge that this view is to be preferred to epistemicism on account of its greater charity towards the participants involved in the relevant ontological debate.宏伟 发表于 2025-3-23 23:01:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_14.pngGenteel 发表于 2025-3-24 04:52:27
Lixian Zhang,Ting Yang,Peng Shi,Yanzheng Zhuxastic disagreement. One such pluralist account, developed out of John MacFarlane’s work, is . .. I criticise Disjunctive Pluralism and argue for an alternative pluralist theory of disagreement that I call . .. Moreover, I argue that kinship pluralism can be adequately extended to other varieties of disagreement, namely . and . disagreement.Fissure 发表于 2025-3-24 07:51:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_16.pngauxiliary 发表于 2025-3-24 14:23:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_17.png连锁,连串 发表于 2025-3-24 17:52:16
Conclusion and Future Research Directionstemic goods. So the pluralism is only apparent. I consider two test cases to confirm this verdict: pragmatic encroachment and epistemic injustice. The conclusion is that there are no good reasons to renounce the traditional view of epistemic monism.PATHY 发表于 2025-3-24 20:38:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_19.png爱得痛了 发表于 2025-3-25 01:36:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313311/313311_20.png