Cumbersome 发表于 2025-3-23 13:26:52

Experience,erience has posed serious difficulties to his interpreters. My proposal is irenic: I take Dewey’s experience to be a function performed by living beings who have the capacity to master the use of language. I focus on the metaphilosophical use that Dewey makes of the notion of experience thus underst

ALIAS 发表于 2025-3-23 15:16:22

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_12.png

Endemic 发表于 2025-3-23 19:40:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_13.png

类型 发表于 2025-3-23 22:39:40

Construction,is carried out. Dewey is explicit that all the elements that are used in inquiry – and which he calls ‘propositions’ – are linguistic, and that taken together they contribute to the construction of the judgment that closes inquiry. I will reconstruct Dewey’s account of evidence, a priori knowledge,

痛恨 发表于 2025-3-24 06:16:36

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_15.png

可行 发表于 2025-3-24 06:37:04

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_16.png

憎恶 发表于 2025-3-24 10:41:36

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_17.png

MONY 发表于 2025-3-24 15:43:54

Kuang-Yao Lee,Bing Li,Hongyu Zhaotogether they contribute to the construction of the judgment that closes inquiry. I will reconstruct Dewey’s account of evidence, a priori knowledge, and objectivity, and I will show how the latter paves the way for the formulation of a strong form of scientific pluralism.

善辩 发表于 2025-3-24 23:01:25

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_19.png

不给啤 发表于 2025-3-25 01:57:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science; Roberto Gronda Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Dewey Philosophy of Science.Dewey Logical cons