gloomy 发表于 2025-3-21 19:14:51
书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0270360<br><br> <br><br>不适当 发表于 2025-3-21 21:19:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_2.pngMawkish 发表于 2025-3-22 01:51:58
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/270360.jpg骚扰 发表于 2025-3-22 05:32:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_4.pngCantankerous 发表于 2025-3-22 12:07:15
978-3-030-37564-5Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020sultry 发表于 2025-3-22 13:32:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270360/270360_6.pngsultry 发表于 2025-3-22 17:50:17
Olga Kolokytha,Katharine Sarikakis formulate in Chaps. 3 and 4. It also strengthens and refines the conclusions reached in Chap. 1, thus providing a more fine-grained analysis of the structure of life-behaviors. Dewey’s theory of inquiry is grounded in the distinction that Dewey draws between signs and symbols, and between significaEuphonious 发表于 2025-3-22 22:17:49
Meng-Yuan Tsai,Henry Horng-Shing Luof Dewey’s idea of inquiry should be ‘cashed out’ at a metaphilosophical level, in terms of the language that we should use to describe the structure of scientific activities. I argue that Dewey’s naturalism, together with his emphasis on the metaphilosophical primacy of the category of activity, pu清真寺 发表于 2025-3-23 02:09:03
Kuang-Yao Lee,Bing Li,Hongyu Zhaois carried out. Dewey is explicit that all the elements that are used in inquiry – and which he calls ‘propositions’ – are linguistic, and that taken together they contribute to the construction of the judgment that closes inquiry. I will reconstruct Dewey’s account of evidence, a priori knowledge,Heart-Rate 发表于 2025-3-23 08:19:21
Handbook of Statistical Bioinformaticsstrumentalism. On the contrary, I think Dewey is a scientific realist. My aim is to figure out what kind of scientific realism he embraces and defends in his texts. I reject the interpretation that Dewey’s scientific realism is a form of structural realism. Relying on the conclusions reached in the