Lasting
发表于 2025-3-23 12:14:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08940-6predicates, we shall in this paper use the uppercase letters ., C, …, ., …. The reader may think of them as standing for some (unspecified) properties and relations of human acts. It is important to realize, and to keep in mind, that these letters do not represent individual acts, but stand for cert
诗集
发表于 2025-3-23 17:26:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0069742isholm criticizes some systems of so-called deontic logic, among them the system proposed by me in 1951,. on the ground that they are unable to cope with this normative idea. He also makes some positive suggestions concerning the logical structure of the imperatives in question.
Perennial长期的
发表于 2025-3-23 22:06:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_13.png
VALID
发表于 2025-3-24 01:14:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_14.png
相容
发表于 2025-3-24 03:29:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_15.png
intelligible
发表于 2025-3-24 08:26:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_16.png
entreat
发表于 2025-3-24 12:27:52
An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,] and . The ‘paradoxes’ which arise in these logics seem to indicate that the axioms reflect only some special senses of the words ‘obligation’ and ‘permission’. I believe that the questions of what these special senses are can be clarified by exhibiting a simple picture of the formal structure of these logics.
哄骗
发表于 2025-3-24 15:43:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_18.png
disparage
发表于 2025-3-24 22:25:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_19.png
finite
发表于 2025-3-25 02:26:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_20.png