广大
发表于 2025-3-25 04:36:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_21.png
下级
发表于 2025-3-25 11:18:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6696-4] and . The ‘paradoxes’ which arise in these logics seem to indicate that the axioms reflect only some special senses of the words ‘obligation’ and ‘permission’. I believe that the questions of what these special senses are can be clarified by exhibiting a simple picture of the formal structure of these logics.
adulterant
发表于 2025-3-25 12:32:10
Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings
vibrant
发表于 2025-3-25 18:57:06
Deontic Logic: An Introduction,lated to the logic of imperatives (or the logic of commands); in fact, many authors regard these fields as essentially the same.. What is here called deontic logic has also been referred to as . and . (or logic of .)..
vasospasm
发表于 2025-3-25 20:34:50
Richard A. Harshman,Elizabeth Hampsonlated to the logic of imperatives (or the logic of commands); in fact, many authors regard these fields as essentially the same.. What is here called deontic logic has also been referred to as . and . (or logic of .)..
Noisome
发表于 2025-3-26 03:11:18
Some Logics of Commitment and Obligation,gicians that the notion of commitment cannot be reduced to that of obligation.. In this paper we define a family of propositional logics in which both commitment and obligation are formalized as independent operators.
intelligible
发表于 2025-3-26 06:52:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_27.png
Chronological
发表于 2025-3-26 10:04:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_28.png
BURSA
发表于 2025-3-26 14:41:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2657/265685/265685_29.png
调色板
发表于 2025-3-26 17:44:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54805-9gicians that the notion of commitment cannot be reduced to that of obligation.. In this paper we define a family of propositional logics in which both commitment and obligation are formalized as independent operators.