彩色 发表于 2025-3-28 18:33:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1162-3Dimension; Grad; Homeomorphism; functional analysis; manifold; topology军械库 发表于 2025-3-28 21:12:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237017/237017_42.png门窗的侧柱 发表于 2025-3-28 23:52:08
Mathematics and Its Applicationshttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/237017.jpg许可 发表于 2025-3-29 06:18:12
Elke Franz,Anja Jerichow,Andreas PfitzmannIn this section all multivalued mappings are assumed to have convex values in some Banach space. We begin with the union of Theorems (1.1) and (1.5) .中和 发表于 2025-3-29 10:25:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237017/237017_45.png放大 发表于 2025-3-29 15:01:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87092-6Pełczyński introduced the notion of Milyutin space and Dugundji space. Ščepin proposed the notions of Milyutin mapping and Dugundji embedding and defined a . (.) . as a compactum which admits a Milyutin mapping (respectively, Dugundji embedding) from a power {0, 1}. onto . (respectively, from . into a power .).Perineum 发表于 2025-3-29 19:36:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2371/237017/237017_47.png吞没 发表于 2025-3-29 19:52:34
Regular Mappings and Locally Trivial FibrationsLet f: . → . be a continuous surjection and . a topological space. Then . is said to be a . with a ., if for each . ∈ ., there exists a neighborhood . = .(.) and a homeomorphism . such that . where . is the projection onto the first factor.seduce 发表于 2025-3-30 00:51:26
Soft MappingsPełczyński introduced the notion of Milyutin space and Dugundji space. Ščepin proposed the notions of Milyutin mapping and Dugundji embedding and defined a . (.) . as a compactum which admits a Milyutin mapping (respectively, Dugundji embedding) from a power {0, 1}. onto . (respectively, from . into a power .).浓缩 发表于 2025-3-30 06:57:13
Zero-Dimensional Selection Theoremof of Convex-valued theorem, but without any partitions of unity. As in the previous paragraph we begin (see Section 1) by the necessity conditions for solvability of the selection problem for an arbitrary closed-valued mapping. Our proof of Theorem (2.4) follows the original one . The converse theorem (2.1) is a well-known folklore result.