Irascible 发表于 2025-3-26 21:28:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_31.pngSNEER 发表于 2025-3-27 04:16:36
Global Conclusions: The Varieties of Contingent A Priori Truths, normally recognized in the literature concerned with contingent a priori truths.) Moreover, if the perspective presented in the book is correct, contingent a priori truths can be seen as much more pervasive in our cognitive lives than most commentators have supposed.黑豹 发表于 2025-3-27 06:15:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_33.png哺乳动物 发表于 2025-3-27 11:41:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_34.png说笑 发表于 2025-3-27 16:01:10
,The Starting Point: Kripke’s “Magic”,ow scope. I also point out what I take to be two serious limitations of Kripke’s account, one of them related to the lack of specification concerning the truth-makers of contingent a priori truths, and the other concerning the prospects for extending the possibility of knowing such truths to other people besides the stipulator.ADJ 发表于 2025-3-27 19:50:19
Donnellan and the Acquaintance Requirement,ft open by Donnellan which, curiously, suggests a treatment of Kripke’s cases of contingent a priori truths along the lines that I propose in Chap. . of the book (i.e., as the product of a special kind of illocutionary act).脾气暴躁的人 发表于 2025-3-27 22:57:06
0166-6991 ingent a priori truths.Features a new approach to Kripke’s c.This monograph offers a comprehensive study of contingent a priori truths. Building onto a theoretical framework developed by the philosopher and logician Saul Kripke, the author also presents a new approach to these truths...The first parLiberate 发表于 2025-3-28 05:58:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_38.png观点 发表于 2025-3-28 08:27:14
Existence and Uniqueness Resultss, the distinction is not clearly motivated, besides employing a misleading terminology. Moreover, I argue that Evans’ application of his distinction to Kripke’s cases relies on a questionable separation between cognitive content and modal profile of a proposition.空洞 发表于 2025-3-28 10:29:00
Approximations of Variational Inequalitiesogic of Demonstratives (what I call . sentences) that can see them as cases of deeply contingent truths. I discuss the possibility of extending Kaplan’s conceptual apparatus to Williamson’s case, and to BonJour’s defense of the inductive principle as a priori.