本土
发表于 2025-3-25 05:00:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_21.png
收集
发表于 2025-3-25 07:30:02
,Indexicals and Kaplan’s Cases,xts of utterances are only ., and that indexicals and demonstratives always take their semantic values from the contexts of utterances (and never from other contexts). I conclude the chapter with a contrast between Kripke’s and Kaplan’s conception of contingent a priori truths.
oxidant
发表于 2025-3-25 13:23:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_23.png
不舒服
发表于 2025-3-25 19:10:25
Some Other Cases,ogic of Demonstratives (what I call . sentences) that can see them as cases of deeply contingent truths. I discuss the possibility of extending Kaplan’s conceptual apparatus to Williamson’s case, and to BonJour’s defense of the inductive principle as a priori.
farewell
发表于 2025-3-25 22:11:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_25.png
Daily-Value
发表于 2025-3-26 03:16:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_26.png
不适
发表于 2025-3-26 05:19:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_27.png
摆动
发表于 2025-3-26 12:32:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_28.png
欲望
发表于 2025-3-26 14:09:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2370/236947/236947_29.png
foodstuff
发表于 2025-3-26 19:14:47
Regression Checking of Changes in C Software normally recognized in the literature concerned with contingent a priori truths.) Moreover, if the perspective presented in the book is correct, contingent a priori truths can be seen as much more pervasive in our cognitive lives than most commentators have supposed.