aspirant 发表于 2025-3-21 16:24:23
书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Alternatives to Capitalism: The Economics of Partnership读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0230854<br><br> <br><br>结束 发表于 2025-3-21 21:44:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_2.pngInfant 发表于 2025-3-22 03:39:32
Presidentialismparliamentary. However, the latter distinction is more difficult to draw than the former one. Sure, presidential and parliamentary systems can be defined by mutual exclusion. Sure, a presidential system is non-parliamentary and, conversely, a parliamentary system is non-presidential. But the distribindigenous 发表于 2025-3-22 07:45:19
Parliamentary Systemsaration of power between parliament and government: they are all based on legislative-executive power sharing.. Which is also to say that all the systems that we call parliamentary require governments to be appointed, supported and, as the case may be, discharged, by parliamentary vote. But to say tFoment 发表于 2025-3-22 11:48:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_5.png步兵 发表于 2025-3-22 13:40:53
The Difficulty of Politics politics results from many reasons. Intellectually it goes back to the late sixties, when the campus revolution brought to the fore a new democratic primitivism. However, the seeds of difficult politics are also technological and have a lot to do with video-democracy. And, in the interim, we are co步兵 发表于 2025-3-22 20:27:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_7.pngexostosis 发表于 2025-3-22 22:08:49
The Paradox of Governing by Legislatingly the easy part of the question, How strong should an intermittent president be allowed to be? Its difficult part begins with asking, How can his governing avoid parliamentary obstructionism? More exactly put, How much legislative power does a president need in order to have his legislation passed积云 发表于 2025-3-23 02:45:41
Problems with Presidential Systemsith these two issues. The fundamental issue remains, however, the support that presidents can expect to obtain in their respective Congresses. The support problem has already been discussed at various points, but one of the indicators that help its assessment is the nature of the party system. I thuvitrectomy 发表于 2025-3-23 07:53:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_10.png