乳汁 发表于 2025-3-23 09:57:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_11.pnghysterectomy 发表于 2025-3-23 17:47:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_12.pngGAVEL 发表于 2025-3-23 19:17:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_13.png真 发表于 2025-3-24 00:25:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_14.pngBRUNT 发表于 2025-3-24 05:06:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_15.png饮料 发表于 2025-3-24 07:03:21
H.-D. Sauer,J. Münstermann,T. Röhrlously, what if they start pulling in opposite directions and work against one another? While the French system is able to handle divided government, still the risk of having two counter-pulling engines cannot be ruled out.Decline 发表于 2025-3-24 12:52:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_17.pngjealousy 发表于 2025-3-24 16:47:09
Christoph Minnig,Beat Uebelhartr common name a misnomer for a deceitful togetherness. We shall look into this later. Here, and first, we are required to define presidential systems and thereby to make sure that they are not confused with facade presidential forms or erroneously perceived as mixes, as quasi- or near-parliamentary presidentialisms.哑剧 发表于 2025-3-24 19:17:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2309/230854/230854_19.png蒙太奇 发表于 2025-3-25 02:39:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04542-5nt to the need of efficient government, while the French type sacrifices efficient government to the representativeness of parliament... we cannot build a representational system that maximizes at one and the same time the function of functioning and the function of mirroring.’