犬儒主义者 发表于 2025-3-26 23:38:04
Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism978-3-319-10238-2Series ISSN 1572-5596Debrief 发表于 2025-3-27 01:39:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10238-2Cambridge Injunctions; Christian ethics; Christian life; Ephesians; Martin Bucer; Rhenish “school” of exeolfction 发表于 2025-3-27 07:47:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_33.pngNICHE 发表于 2025-3-27 12:23:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_34.png新奇 发表于 2025-3-27 15:05:32
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641es in 1550–1551. Although the Cambridge Injunctions of 1535 took a highly critical stance towards toward traditional patterns of the teaching of theology, they did fairly identify the constituent elements of the scholastic theological curriculum: an initial focus on the Bible; the crucial role of PeHirsutism 发表于 2025-3-27 20:00:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_36.png竞选运动 发表于 2025-3-27 23:33:38
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641nsciously display his effort to meet the requirements of the Cambridge Injunctions and at the same time testify to his continued commitment to the program of biblical humanism. It is necessary to read Bucer’s methodological statement in 1550 within the context of his earlier career, including a brieingestion 发表于 2025-3-28 04:35:30
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641the biblical humanist program. This is clear in Bucer’s attention to text-critical matters; philological issues; matters of grammar and rhetoric; attention to the author in context; his use of Scripture to interpret Scripture; and the manner in which he used non-Scriptural authorities. In looking at兽皮 发表于 2025-3-28 07:09:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_39.png阻挡 发表于 2025-3-28 10:42:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_40.png