声明
发表于 2025-3-23 11:23:21
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641it. Efforts towards reform of the theological curriculum in Cambridge took a dramatic turn with the introduction of the Cambridge Injunctions. Nevertheless, the Injunctions appear to have had little substantial impact on the teaching of theology prior to the reign of Edward VI.
ureter
发表于 2025-3-23 16:58:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_12.png
reptile
发表于 2025-3-23 20:31:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_13.png
尽责
发表于 2025-3-23 23:47:29
Introduction,e (the principal focus in this study) and in his prior career. It becomes clear that Bucer was a theologian in the model of biblical humanism: exegesis as the true theology, the exegete as the true theologian.
粘连
发表于 2025-3-24 03:39:39
The Old Theology and the New Learning at Cambridge to 1549it. Efforts towards reform of the theological curriculum in Cambridge took a dramatic turn with the introduction of the Cambridge Injunctions. Nevertheless, the Injunctions appear to have had little substantial impact on the teaching of theology prior to the reign of Edward VI.
BROOK
发表于 2025-3-24 09:01:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_16.png
平庸的人或物
发表于 2025-3-24 13:38:14
Theology in an Exegetical Context: Bucer on Ephesians 1:3–6 and the Doctrine of Electionlvin (and other Protestant or evangelical exegetes). Yet in his attention to Paul’s letter as a theological compendium, and in his effort to pattern his own lectures as the same, Bucer’s treatment does have a distinctive character, and the method and purpose of his theology is distinctively that of biblical humanism.
Palpate
发表于 2025-3-24 15:37:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_18.png
连系
发表于 2025-3-24 19:41:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_19.png
垫子
发表于 2025-3-25 00:06:37
1572-5596 cholasticism.Is the first extended study devoted exclusively.This book describes Martin Bucer (1491-1551) as a teacher of theology, focusing on his time as Regius Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge between 1549 and 1551. The book is centered on his 1550 Cambridge lectures on Ephesi