作茧自缚 发表于 2025-3-25 04:17:30

Introduction,e made a Doctor of Theology. The difference between Bucer’s career as an exegete and a theologian and the traditional expectations of individuals to be made a Doctor of Theology point towards the existence of two patterns or approaches to the practice and teaching of theology: the approach of schola

concubine 发表于 2025-3-25 09:50:10

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_22.png

ALTER 发表于 2025-3-25 13:24:19

“Remember the Readings and Preachings of God’s Prophet and True Preacher, Martin Bucer”: Bucer’s Sojthe end of the year was installed as Regius Professor of Divinity. His lectures on Ephesians were given in the midst of the turmoil of Reformation in mid-Tudor Cambridge, an atmosphere that was already charged prior to Bucer’s arrival. It is apparent that Bucer sought to conform his lectures to the

osteopath 发表于 2025-3-25 17:03:16

“,”: Bucer’s Prefatory Lectures on Ephesians and His Use of Biblical Humanist Theological Methodnsciously display his effort to meet the requirements of the Cambridge Injunctions and at the same time testify to his continued commitment to the program of biblical humanism. It is necessary to read Bucer’s methodological statement in 1550 within the context of his earlier career, including a brie

synovitis 发表于 2025-3-25 23:15:40

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_25.png

不幸的人 发表于 2025-3-26 02:00:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_26.png

nautical 发表于 2025-3-26 07:53:52

Theology in an Exegetical Context: Bucer on Ephesians 1:13–18 and the Doctrine of Faithe verses Bucer identified a second . in Paul’s “treatise”, the doctrine of faith. Again, Bucer employed the biblical humanist exegetical method that was his usual practice. While in general his pattern of treatment is like that of the exegetical tradition, he is distinctive in finding these verses t

Bouquet 发表于 2025-3-26 10:39:44

Conclusionridge Injunctions of 1535, but they also show him to be a teacher of theology in the style and method of biblical humanism. The theology he taught and practiced was intensely exegetical in its method, and its purpose was explicitly practical and in no way speculative. Indeed, not only was biblical h

DEMUR 发表于 2025-3-26 14:08:50

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_29.png

investigate 发表于 2025-3-26 18:21:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1915/191410/191410_30.png
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism; The Exegete as Theol N. Scott Amos Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Cam