BAIL
发表于 2025-3-25 06:30:39
Swayam Sampurna Panigrahi,Deepti Chandra of . as a primary focus. I offer historical and scholarly context for these claims before turning to . to illustrate how a concern with relation is present even in Irigaray’s earliest philosophical writings.
N斯巴达人
发表于 2025-3-25 11:25:13
Swayam Sampurna Panigrahi,Deepti Chandraue, drawing on Irigaray’s work in ., that the masculine discourse is itself “psychotic” in Lacanian terms because it refuses a real relation to alterity, proposing only what I call a “nonrelational” limit rather than a relational one.
Leisureliness
发表于 2025-3-25 12:46:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_23.png
AIL
发表于 2025-3-25 18:59:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_24.png
FECT
发表于 2025-3-25 21:13:21
Relation and Refusal: Irigaray with Lacan,ue, drawing on Irigaray’s work in ., that the masculine discourse is itself “psychotic” in Lacanian terms because it refuses a real relation to alterity, proposing only what I call a “nonrelational” limit rather than a relational one.
constitutional
发表于 2025-3-26 01:56:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_26.png
cauda-equina
发表于 2025-3-26 07:22:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_27.png
全能
发表于 2025-3-26 10:42:04
N. V. Subbarao,Bindu Chhabra,Manit Mishraguage and being as events that give the human to itself in relation to the world in order to formulate an idea of language and being as events that give the human to itself as constitutively limited by and related to another human subject—the sexuate other.
太空
发表于 2025-3-26 14:21:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_29.png
commute
发表于 2025-3-26 17:32:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1831/183016/183016_30.png